Privacy & Technology

“The progress of science in furnishing the Government with means of espionage is not likely to stop with wiretapping. Ways may someday be developed by which the Government, without removing papers from secret drawers, can reproduce them in court, and by which it will be enabled to expose a jury the most intimate occurrences of the home…Can it be that the Constitution affords no protection against such invasions of individual security?”
-- Louis Brandeis
U.S. Supreme Court Justice
Olmstead v. United States, (1928)


The word "privacy" means many different things to different people. One widely accepted meaning is "the right to be let alone," as it was described by former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.


The United States is at risk of turning into a full-fledged surveillance society. From using the telephone to seeking medical treatment to applying for a job or sending e-mail over the Internet, our right to information privacy is in peril. Our personal and business information is being digitized through an ever-expanding number of computer networks in formats that allow data to be linked, transferred, shared and sold, usually without our knowledge or consent. Employers and schools are turning to drug testing policies without any reasonable suspicions of illegal drug use. DNA has the power to disclose not only private personal and medical information about any individual but also blood-relatives. The use of DNA is expanding as a tool for crime-solving and has also been used to exonerate the innocent. The same technological advances that have brought enormous benefits also make us more vulnerable than ever before to unwanted snooping.


As technology provides new ways to gather information and databases proliferate, the need for privacy protections becomes more urgent. The ACLU is a national leader in working to guarantee that individuals may determine how and when others can gain access to their personal information.

Litigation

Lanier v. Woodburn

Ninth Circuit Rules Drug-Testing Policy, As Applied, Unconstitutional

Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court Narrows Definition of Disabled Worker

Legislation

Oregon Drivers License Law (SB 1080)

In December 2007, by Executive Order, the Governor greatly restricted who would be eligible for Oregon driver licenses and state-issued ID cards by requiring proof of lawful presence in the country as well as proof of identity.  Lead by Sen. Rick Metsger (D-Welches), the Oregon legislature went even further in creating significant hurdles for Oregonians, including citizens, to obtain either a driver license or ID card.

Medical Marijuana Discrimination (HB 3635)

We anticipated legislation allowing employers to discriminate against employees who are medical marijuana cardholders.  We defeated this proposal in 2007 mostly because time ran out before the bill was moved to the House floor.  Representative Mike Schaufler (D-Happy Valley) insisted on introducing similar legislation for this short session.  However, because House leadership would only allow a “compromise” version to go through, the bill was never heard because there was no compromise to which either the proponents (business community) or opponents (ACLU and othe

Other

ACLU Seeks Records About FBI Collection of Racial and Ethnic Data In Oregon

FBI's Claimed Authority to Track and Map "Behaviors" and "Lifestyle Characteristics" of American Communities Invites Racial Profiling

July 27, 2010 - The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon has asked the Portland FBI field office to turn over records related to the agency's collection and use of race and ethnicity data in local communities.

ACLU Raises Concerns Over City of Portland's Use of Photo Radar and Red Light Cameras

April 7, 2010 – ACLU of Oregon testified before Portland City Council raising concerns about the City’s use of photo radar and red light cameras.