The ACLU is directly representing Maria Araujo as she seeks remission of a court order demanding that she pay her brother-in-law’s security deposit of $20,000.
Visit case page
Jul 16, 2009
Cohen et al. v. Brown
The ACLU opposed IP 30 because it creates a new constitutional “right to life” and then would make other fundamental civil liberties protections in the Oregon Constitution subordinate to that new right.
Visit case page
May 28, 2009
Volkart v. City of Medford
July 2009 - Circuit Court Judge Rules Panhandling Ordinances Unconstitutional
Visit case page
May 21, 2009
Nakashima v. Board of Education
On August 18, 2010, the Oregon Supreme Court ordered the Oregon School Activities Association to pay $66,230 in attorney fees. This case was on behalf of students at Portland Adventist Academy who sought a...
Visit case page
May 19, 2009
State of Oregon v. Gonzales
The ACLU hails the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling respecting the right of mentally competent, terminally ill persons to make end-of-life decisions in consultation with their doctors, and rejecting the...
Visit case page
May 19, 2009
Linn v. Silverton, Perry v. Winston
Joining our recent victory against the City of Winston for its unconstitutional sign ordinance is our victory in a lawsuit against the City of Silverton on behalf of Chris Linn.